In remarks before the Muslim Advocates Dinner, former attorney General Loretta Lynch told attendees that the Justice Department will take action against “anti-Muslim rhetoric” and “violent talk.” Ms. Lynch also said that since the Paris attacks, her greatest concern has been the “incredibly disturbing rise of anti-Muslim rhetoric … that fear is my greatest fear.”
INCREDIBLY DISTURBING anti-Muslim rhetoric? SERIOUSLY? Did the x-head of Cop-land just say that?
Where does YOUR DEEP ROOTED AFFECTION for Islam come from? Or for that matter, where does your complete lack of empathy for the rest of us come from?
Lady, One hundred thirty people were MURDERED by your AFFECTION-COATED MUSLIMS and you have the unmitigated gall to speak of your CONCERN for ANTI-MUSLIM RHETORIC? So, please share. Where does this Muslim Love thing come from?
Your answer, of course, will likely be something similar to, “I hold all people with the same high regard.” Really? Please excuse me ma’am, but I have a hard time with that answer. You see, I find absolutely no evidence, unless we’re MUSLIMS, BLACK LIVES MATTER THUGS, or a member of the TRANSGENDER SPECIES, that you give a rats-ass about us.
Case in point, Since 9/11, Lynch says that the Department of Justice has investigated more than 11,000 acts of anti-Muslim rhetoric, which have led to 45 prosecutions. “I think sadly, that number is going to rise,” said Lynch.
Let’s just have a go at those figures for a moment. I assume that since you provided them, they are, at least partially, true.
Ms. A.G., we seem to be hearing more hyperbole from you concerning ANTI-MUSLIM-RHETORIC, than is even remotely appropriate. Why is that? Who reports Anti-Muslim-Rhetoric to the DOJ, in the first place? Let me take a stab at this one. I say, MUSLIMS.
Let’s assume, for the sake of argument, that I’m right. So, that means Muslims reported ANTI-MUSLIM-RHETORIC on at least 11,000 separate and distinct occasions.
That’s a whole lot for sure. Given your deep affection for the people of the sand, it’s any wonder you were soooo concerned. Let’s see now, you investigated 11,000 cases of ANTI-MUSLIM-RHETORIC, but only 45 were prosecuted? Wow. With all the emphasizes you’ve put on this CRIME WAVE, 45 seems awful low. How could it possibly be that low? I just gotta say that at .004% somebodies lying.
Well, there’s a couple of things that our esteemed Attorney General might consider.
- Either you have the most incompetent and inept lawyers on the planet.
- Or, your Muslim Call a Cop Crowd is lying to you 99.996% of the time.
- Or, your allegiance to upholding the law has been replaced by personal beliefs and preferences.
- Or you’ve mistaken the political will of those who appointed you.
In plain terms Ms. Lynch, if in fact the ANTI-MUSLIM-RHETORIC you’re so fond of DENOUNCING is so prevalent, that little .004% conviction rate is really not acceptable now is it?
There is however, another way of looking at this that may make you feel better. But no, upon further reflection this isn’t gonna make you feel any better after-all.
It appears, from your own numbers, that 99.996% of your ANTI-MUSLIM-RHETORIC investigations, are unsuccessful. Pretty pitiful
I was right wasn’t I? You don’t feel much better do ya?
If it were me, I think I’d wanna find out why these two numbers don’t seem to add up to this “ANTI-MUSLIM-RHETORIC” crime wave of yours. One possibility is that the Muslim Community is using this whole issue as a “Poor Little Muslim” routine. I think, unless you are part of this ploy Ms. Lynch, you might do well to take a long hard look at who’s crying wolf.
If all this information about Ms. Lynch is confusing, maybe I can help clear it up for you guys.
What about the mystery of her Muslim fetish? It seems that our esteemed Attorney General was once a member of the NBLSA (National Black Law Student Association). The group’s leader, Mohammed Kenyatta, called for the “liberation of Palestine” and openly supported the terrorist organization. Really?
During those years the radical black group was openly sympathetic to the Palestinian Liberation Operation (PLO), to the point of inviting a PLO Information Officer to speak at Harvard University. Yes my friends this is the same PLO that terrorized and murdered innocent people for many, many years. I assume Ms. Lynch and her NBLSA clan felt the need to rub elbows with the preeminent TERRORIST organization on earth.
The Harvard Jewish Law Students Association (HJLSA) tried to protest the event, but much like a BLACK LIVES MATTER fiasco, they were excluded. It’s a little different when someone is PROTESTING YOUR BEHAVIOR, isn’t it?
Liberal professor Alan Dershowitz joined the ANTI-PLO protest by saying, “THE BLACK LAW STUDENTS ASSOCIATION (BALSA) committed an unjustifiable and discriminatory violation of student liberties last week when it denied Jewish students an opportunity to participate in a campus forum featuring a representative of the Palestinian Liberation Organization (PLO).”
More
than 30 Jewish Law Students Association (JLSA) members attended the panel discussion. In fact they outnumbered members of BALSA and the Third World Coalition, the event’s sponsors. Only BALSA and TWC members were to be given priority, he announced, proceeding to call on a Black student who hadn’t raised his hand.
Now Ms. Lynch, I know you wouldn’t be part of any act of discrimination, but just to be sure, would you mind telling me how this isn’t one?
Oh yeah, there’s that DEEP ROOTED AFFECTION thing again. Our previously resident DOJ QUEEN seems to have even more troubles to deal with now. It’s been repeatedly proven that government officials will, and do, lie regularly to cover up wrongdoing, but Ms. Lynch you can’t lie to a federal judge hon.
In fact, the judge in this case appears to go out of his way to write something for the masses, not just the parties involved in the litigation.
The case involves a lawsuit filed by 26 states against the federal government challenging President Obama’s immigration amnesty measures. The judge hearing the case, Andrew S. Hanen, issued a 28-page order last week slamming DOJ attorneys representing the administration for intentionally lying to the court, thus violating a multitude of ethics and court rules.
Among other things Hanen accused DOJ lawyers of, is lying in court by claiming that the president’s amnesty plan featuring three-year deferrals wasn’t being implemented, when in fact it was, for more than 100,000 illegal aliens no less.
Judge Hanen ordered DOJ lawyers to participate in Ethics Violation Training, and ordered the federal government to turn over the names, addresses and “all available contact information” of the over 100,000 immigrants admitted to the United States illegally by their actions.
Never fear, Ms. Lynch is on the job protecting her lawyers, and all 100,000 ill-begotten and illegal aliens, from the courts pesky little ruling by saying it’s harsh and inappropriate.
As hard as I may try, it’s very difficult to find any punishment too harsh or too inappropriate, for an officer of the court that knowingly LIES IN AN EFFORT TO SUBVERT THE LAW.
In fact, Ms. Lynch’s DOJ is ACTIVELY resisting a Court Order to Provide Ethics Training for Its Lawyers, and is attempting to Hide the Names of the 100,000 Illegal Aliens Granted Amnesty.
http://dailysignal.com/2016/06/02/doj-resists-court-order-to-provide-ethics-training-for-its-lawyers/?utm_source=facebook&utm_medium=social&utm_campaign=thf-fbFrankly,
What does it say about Ms. Lynch and the DOJ when they routinely BREAK THE LAWS THEY ARE SWORN TO UPHOLD. How in the world can they refuse to accept their punishment and defy the orders of Federal Judge? Because they are little more than criminals, and they can.
Ms. Lynch, in your learned opinion, when the chief law enforcement agency of the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA is caught lying to a FEDERAL JUDGE, WHAT IS THE APPROPRIATE PUNISHMENT?
Am I an Islamophobic? Do I hate Muslims? Do I hate immigrants and/or refugees in general? No, of course not. Frankly my dislike is more centered on our crooked and devise government than Islam.
My problem is not with Muslims or immigrants in general, it’s the fact that Muslims and immigrants, legal or not, are treated as if they deserve more than the laws allow, while American Citizens are simply an after thought to your brand of justice.
As for a Phobia, I must admit I do have one however. Through no fault of my own, and after much deliberation, I’m now a proud LYNCHOPHOBE.
Ms. Lynch if you continue to push illegal immigrants and refugees down our throats, while completely ignoring our civil rights and the law of the land, I’m pretty sure that someday we’re gonna have a serious disagreement over it, one that you can’t lie away.